Showing posts sorted by relevance for query discriminatory law. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query discriminatory law. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Justice Department Report, Released Today, Calls Louisiana's "Crime Against Nature" Law Discriminatory

An earlier version of this article originally appeared on ColorLines.com

Eve is a transgender woman living in rural southern Louisiana. She was molested as a child and left home as a teenager. Homeless and alone, she was forced to trade sex for survival. While still a teenager, she was arrested and charged with a Crime Against Nature, an archaic Louisiana law originally designed to penalize sex acts associated with gays and lesbians.

Now Eve is one of nine plaintiffs fighting the law in a federal civil rights complaint that advocates hope will finally put this official discrimination to an end.

This legal action comes in the context of increased scrutiny from the federal government over the conduct of the New Orleans Police Department. A US Justice Department investigation of the NOPD, released today, found "reasonable cause to believe that patterns and practices of unconstitutional conduct and/or violations of federal law occurred in several areas," including "racial and ethnic profiling and lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender (LGBT) discrimination." The report specifically mentioned Louisiana's Crime Against Nature law, calling it "a statute whose history reflects anti-LGBT sentiment." The report also concluded that investigators "found reasonable cause to believe that NOPD practices lead to discriminatory treatment of LGBT individuals."

Punishing Women

Eve, who asked that her real name and age remain confidential, spent two years in prison. During her time behind bars she was raped and contracted HIV. Upon release, she was forced to register in the state’s sex offender database. The words “sex offender” now appear on her driver’s license. “I have tried desperately to change my life,” she says, but her status on the database stands in the way of housing and other programs. “When I present my ID for anything,” she says, “the assumption is that you’re a child molester or a rapist. The discrimination is just ongoing and ongoing.”

Eve was penalized under Louisiana’s 205-year-old Crime Against Nature statute, a blatantly discriminatory law that legislators have maneuvered to keep on the state’s books for the purpose of turning sex workers into felons. As enforced, the law specifically singles out oral and anal sex for greater punishment for those arrested for prostitution, including requiring those convicted to register as sex offenders in a public database. Advocates say the law has further isolated and targeted poor women of color, transgender women, and especially those who are forced to trade sex for food or a place to sleep at night.

In 2003, the Supreme Court outlawed sodomy laws with its decision in Lawrence v. Texas. That ruling should have invalidated Louisiana’s law entirely. Instead, the state has chosen to only enforce the portion of the law that concerns “solicitation” of a crime against nature. The decision on whether to charge accused sex workers with a felony instead of Louisiana’s misdemeanor prostitution law is left entirely in the hands of police and prosecutors.

“This leaves the door wide open to discriminatory enforcement targeting poor black women, transgender women, and gay men for a charge that carries much harsher penalties,” says police misconduct attorney and organizer Andrea J. Ritchie, a co-counsel in a new federal lawsuit challenging the statute.

A media-fueled national panic about child molesters has brought sex offender registries to every state. But advocates warn that, across the U.S., these registries have been used disproportionately against African Americans and other communities of color, and are often used for purposes outside of their original intent. Louisiana, however, is the only state in the U.S. that requires people who have been convicted of crimes that do not involve minors or sexual violence to register as sex offenders.

In 1994, Congress passed Megan’s Law, also known as the Wetterling Act, which mandated that states create systems for registering sex offenders. The act was amended in 1996 to require public disclosure of the names on the registries and again in 2006 to require sex offenders stay in the public registry for at least 15 years.

Megan’s Law was clearly not targeted at prostitution. However, Louisiana lawmakers opted to apply the registry to the crimes against nature statute as well, and at that moment started down the path to a new level of punishment for sex work. “This archaic law is being used to mark people with modern day scarlet letter,” says attorney Alexis Agathocleus of the Center for Constitutional Rights, another party in the lawsuit.

People convicted under the Louisiana law must carry a state ID with the words “sex offender” printed below their name. If they have to evacuate because of a hurricane, they must stay in a special shelter for sex offenders that has no separate facilities for men and women. They have to pay a $60 annual registration fee, in addition to $250 to $750 to print and mail postcards to their neighbors every time they move. The post cards must show their names and addresses, and often they are required to include a photo. Failing to register and pay the fees, a separate crime, can carry penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

Women and men on the registry will also find their names, addresses, and convictions printed in the newspaper and published in an online sex offender database. The same information is also displayed at public sites like schools and community centers. Women—including one mother of three—have complained that because of their appearance on the registry, they have had men come to their homes demanding sex. A plaintiff in the suit had rocks thrown at her by neighbors. “This has forced me to live in poverty, be on food stamps and welfare,” explains a man who was on the list. “I’ve never done that before.”

In Orleans Parish, 292 people are on the registry for selling sex, versus 85 people convicted of forcible rape and 78 convicted of “indecent behavior with juveniles.” Almost 40 percent of those registered in Orleans Parish are there solely because they were accused of offering anal or oral sex for money. Seventy-five percent of those on the database for Crime Against Nature are women, and 80 percent are African American. Evidence gathered by advocates suggests a majority are poor or indigent.

Legal advocates credit on-the-ground organizing and the advocacy of the group Women With A Vision (WWAV) for making them aware of this discriminatory law. WWAV, a 20-year-old New Orleans-based organization, provides health care and other services to women involved in survival sex work. “Many of these women are survivors of rape and domestic violence themselves,” says WWAV executive director Deon Haywood. “Yet they are being treated as predators.”

Plaintiffs Tell Their Stories

Ian, another plaintiff in the legal challenge to the Crime Against Nature statute, was homeless from the age of 13, and began trading sex for survival. When an undercover officer approached him and asked him for sex, Ian asked for money. “All I said was $50,” he says, “And they put me away for four years.”

In prison, Ian was raped by a correction officer and by other prisoners, and like Eve, he contracted HIV. Now, he says, potential employers see the words “sex offender” written on his ID and no one will hire him. “Do I deserve to be punished any more than I’ve already been punished?” he asks. “I was 13 years old. That’s the only way I knew how to survive.”

Hiroke, a New Orleans resident and another plaintiff in the suit, spoke on a call set up by advocates. “I had just graduated from high school and was just coming out as transgender,” she says. Hiroke was arrested and convicted while still a teenager. As she began to describe her experience, Hiroke’s voice began to shake. “I was being held with men in jail at the time…” she began. Then there was silence on the line. Holding back tears, she then apologized for being unable to continue.

The Louisiana legislature recently passed a reform of the Crime Against Nature statute, but for the vast majority of those affected, the change makes little to no difference. Although the new law takes away the registration component for a first conviction, a second conviction requires 15 years on the registry, and up to five years imprisonment. A third conviction mandates a lifetime on the registry. More than 538 men and women remain on the registry because they were convicted of offering anal or oral sex, with more added almost every day.

The legal challenge to the Crime Against Nature law, called Doe v. Jindal, has been filed in Louisiana’s US District Court Eastern District on behalf of nine anonymous plaintiffs. It was filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights, attorney Andrea J. Ritchie, and the Law Clinic at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. The anonymous plaintiffs include a grandmother, a mother of four, three transgender women, and a man, all of whom have been required to register as sex offenders from 15 years to life as a result of their convictions for the solicitation of oral sex for money.

Monday, August 1, 2011

State of Louisiana Continues Push to Criminalize Sex Workers

This June, criminal justice activists in Louisiana won a major victory with the passage of a bill that effectively moved prostitution convictions back to the level of misdemeanor, heralding the end of Louisiana's archaic practice of forcing sex workers to register as sex offenders.

But lawyers for the state of Louisiana apparently still haven't gotten the message. Although the new law will prevent prosecutors and police from the practice in the future, the state is still defending the use of the law for those already convicted.

This is important, because at least 400 women are still being forced to register under the law - some have been sentenced to continue to face this burden for decades more. The state could do the right thing now and do away with the requirement. But instead they are choosing to fight to preserve the draconian punishment, and keep the sex offender registration requirement in effect for those convicted under the law in the past.

In a hearing scheduled for next week, lawyers for the state of Louisiana will argue that the law is constitutional and the sex offender registration should continue to be enforced on women who have already been convicted. "How can state attorneys argue for the necessity of something that the legislature has already voted to eliminate?" asks Davida Finger, Assistant Clinical Professor at Loyola and one of the lawyers who have filed suit against the state.

In other words, although the state legislature has voted to do away with the sex offender requirements, clearly showing that they believe they are not appropriate, and Governor Bobby Jindal has signed the bill that does away with the requirements, this other arm of state government is still defending the law.

Lawyers and advocates are encouraging those who are concerned about this case to come to court on Wednesday morning for the hearing.

The hearing will be:
Wednesday, August 10, 10:00am
500 Poydras, Courtroom C 551

Some background:

Previously, police officers and prosecutors in Louisiana had a choice between charging accused sex workers under the prostitution law, which was a misdemeanor, or under Louisiana's 200-plus year-old "Crime Against Nature" law, a felony. That law was interpreted to apply specifically to solicitation for oral or anal sex, but in practice it meant police had ultimate discretion on who to charge with the greater offense.

The majority sentenced under the law were indigent women of color and transgender women of color. Once convicted, they were also forced to register as sex offenders, which brought a long list of restrictions and requirements, including having the words "sex offender" printed in large letters on their driver's license, and the obligation to send a post card to all of their neighbors informing everyone of their conviction.

The new law did not eliminate the "Crime Against Nature" category entirely, but it made the penalties equal to the misdemeanor-level prostitution charge.

While police continue to harass sex workers across the state, and many women are still imprisoned under these regressive laws (even as US Senator David Vitter faced no penalty for his admitted liaisons with prostitutes), this is a step forward. And much credit should go to the NO Justice Project, convened by Women With A Vision, which worked to raise awareness about this unjust law and fought on multiple fronts to bring it to an end.

In a statement from the NO Justice Project released after the law was signed, Davida Finger, Assistant Clinical Professor at Loyola said, “We welcome this change in the law, which finally brings Louisiana in line with every other state in the country. But the injustice still persists. Almost 40 percent of registered sex offenders in New Orleans are on the registry because of a Solicitation of a Crime Against Nature (SCAN) conviction. They too should receive the benefit of this change in the law and be removed from the sex offender registry.”

Women With A Vision Executive Director Deon Haywood added, "We will continue to fight for justice for all those still living under the penalties of the past. There is still serious work to be done.”

“The grassroots and national leadership of Women with a Vision in tirelessly raising this issue for the past three years is nothing short of heroic,” said Andrea Ritchie, co-counsel in Doe v. Jindal, police misconduct attorney and expert on U.S. policing of women and LGBT people. “This victory is a product of collaboration between community groups, legal advocacy organizations and legislators seeking justice on behalf of the women and LGBT youth suffering from the discriminatory effects of SCAN – it is clear that community organizing can make real change.”

Women With A Vision urges those who have SCAN charges on their record and currently are on the registry to contact them at 504.301.0428.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Pledge in Support of a Just Rebuilding of St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana and the U.S. Gulf Coast

Sign-On Letter for Local and National Relief Organizations and Volunteer Groups
(To add your name to the list of signers, please email StBernardParishLetter@gmail.com)


In September of 2006, the Parish Council in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana enacted a law that would have prohibited home-owners from renting homes to anyone other than a “blood relative.” Since the Parish is overwhelmingly white and had few Jewish citizens, the law effectively made it a crime to rent to African Americans, Vietnamese Americans, Latinos, Jews, and other populations who did not live in the parish in large numbers pre-Katrina.

Many of us engaged in rebuilding and relief work were deeply troubled by the “blood-relative” law and similar policies that discouraged the return of African Americans and the poor in New Orleans and throughout the Gulf Coast. Regrettably, many relief and volunteer organizations chose not to respond to the “blood-relative” law, remaining silent on this issue.

With the benefit of hindsight, we now know that St. Bernard Parish officials interpreted silence as consent, which has now emboldened them to pursue other means to defy the Fair Housing Act. The Parish and its leaders are openly disobeying a federal court order and considering a charter change that would require public referendum on any proposal to construct affordable multi-family housing. Their actions have been repeatedly ruled illegal in federal court because they are discriminatory in intent and impact

It is time that we take a stand against discrimination wherever it occurs, and make clear what the moral imperatives are for all organizations that seek to rebuild the Gulf Coast as a fair and just society.

As local and national relief organizations and volunteer groups, we recognize we have a moral obligation to work towards a just rebuilding of the Gulf Coast, and we pledge to speak out against injustice where we see it. This includes discriminatory housing policies, such as those pursued by elected officials in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana.

Signed,

(To add your name to the list of signers, please email StBernardParishLetter@gmail.com)

September 14, 2009

via facsimile: 278.4209
St. Bernard Parish Council & President
8201 W. Judge Perez Drive
Chalmette, Louisiana 70043

Re: Fair Housing in St. Bernard Parish

Dear St. Bernard Officials:

We are a coalition of community organizations from the Greater New Orleans area, writing to express our grave concern and disappointment over recent actions taken by St. Bernard Parish government to block equitable housing access in the Greater New Orleans area.

The Parish was sued by Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center (GNOFHAC) in 2006 for alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, in enacting several housing ordinances with the intent and effect of discriminating against minorities. At that time, GNOFHAC fought to enjoin the Parish from enacting a so-called “blood relative ordinance, that is, the housing ordinance passed on September 19, 2006 that stated “No person…shall rent, lease, loan, or otherwise allow occupancy or use of any single-family residence located in an R-1 zone by any person or group of persons, other than a family member(s) related by blood within the first, second, or third direct ascending or descending generation(s) without first obtaining a Permissive Use Permit from the S. Bernard Parish Council.”

On February 27, 2008, you agreed the Parish would no longer (a) refuse to rent a dwelling unit, or otherwise make unavailable or deny a dwelling unit, to any person because of race or national origin; (b) deny minority citizens the same rights as are enjoyed by white citizens to make and enforce contracts; (c) deny minority citizens the same rights as are enjoyed by white citizens to lease, hold and otherwise enjoy real property; (d) deny any person equal protection of the law by discriminating on the basis of race and national origin in the leasing of real property; or (e) retaliate against Plaintiffs or any other person who alleges that Defendants have violated the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.

In spite of this agreement, in September 2008 the Parish violated its terms by enacting an ordinance that placed a moratorium on the construction of all multi-family housing (i.e., buildings with more than 5 units) for a period of twelve months or until the Parish Council enacted certain zoning updates. The effect of this ordinance was that it triggered cumbersome bureaucratic procedures, including a special election for which that developer must bear the costs. This ordinance would have had a detrimental impact on housing development, and stymie movement of certain people who want to reside in St. Bernard Parish. People of color, who are more likely to depend on multi-family housing post-Katrina, would have been especially harmed if this moratorium had been allowed to stand.

This latest initiative follows a pattern and practice in St. Bernard Parish to prevent development of low income housing at a time when our community could not be more desperate for safe and affordable units.

St. Bernard Parish’s post-Katrina efforts to rebuild a racially segregated Parish by passing and implementing rules to prevent non-White homeowners from moving to and living in the Parish have become an international symbol of injustice in the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast. The 2006 “blood-relative” ordinance would have prohibited single family homeowners from renting to anyone other than blood relatives, effectively excluding many ethnic groups from residing in St. Bernard Parish; including African Americans, Jewish Americans, Vietnamese Americans, Latinos, and other populations who did not live in the parish in large numbers pre-Katrina.

Fortunately, U.S. District Court Judge Helen G. Berrigan ruled this 2006 ‘blood-relative’ ordinance is illegal based on its discriminatory intent and impact. The Times Picayune editorial board wrote, “This ruling strips off the camouflage and reveals St. Bernard's actions for what they really are: an effort to keep lower-income people and African-Americans from moving into the mostly white parish.”

Since the date of the district court’s first order, Judge Berrigan has held the Parish in contempt three times for its failures to comply with the agreed upon and court-approved Consent Decree. But the St. Bernard Parish government, with apparent support from Parish residents and associations, continues to pass laws in support of segregated housing. Related ordinances restricting the development of rental housing in St. Bernard Parish have also been struck down as discriminatory, yet the Parish forges on in this regressive homage to racial and ethnic isolation.

These illegal ordinances and their progeny hurt all Greater New Orleans area residents by erecting barricades that obstruct a just rebuilding, instead of clearing the road for an equitable right to return home.

We will not be silent as our neighbor community actively discriminates. These policies create a climate of discrimination and magnify racial and ethnic tensions in our community, while also exacerbating our local housing crisis. As concerned community members, we call on St. Bernard Parish government to immediately end these discriminatory practices, and instead to join with us in standing for a just rebuilding for all Gulf Coast residents. By standing together, all of our communities benefit.

Signed,

Organizations Endorsing:
Action Coalition for Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice - University of New Orleans
Advancement Project
Advocates for Environmental Human Rights
C3/Hands Off Iberville
Caffin Avenue Church of God
Coastal Women for Change
Common Ground Health Clinic
Community Church Unitarian Universalist - New Orleans
Emerging ChangeMakers Network
Families and Friends of Louisiana's Incarcerated Children
Homeless Action Team of Tulane University (HATT)
Jesuit Social Research Institute, Loyola University
Junebug Productions
Katrina Rita Diaspora Solidarity
Loyola University Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild
Louisiana Justice Institute
Lower Ninth Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development
Lower 9th Ward Homeowner's Association
Mayday New Orleans,Housing and Human Rights Organization
Mennonite Central Committee - New Orleans
Mississippi Center for Justice
Mondo Bizarro
Moving Forward Gulf Coast, Inc
National Economic and Social Rights Initiative (NESRI)
New Orleans Palestine Solidarity
New Americans Social Club (New Orleans Holocaust Survivors Organization)
PATOIS: The New Orleans International Human Rights Film Festival
People's Institute for Survival & Beyond
Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Pyramid Community Parent Resource Center
Southern Institute for Education and Research
Survivors Village
US Human Rights Network
Zion Travelers Cooperative Center

Individual Endorsements:
Kali Akuno, US Human Rights Network
Jay Arena, C3/Hands Off Iberville
Sister Theresa Anne Billeaud
Nell Bolton, Episcopal Community Services, Diocese of Louisiana
Trupania W. Bonner, Moving Forward Gulf Coast, Inc
Douglas Brinkley, Professor of History, Rice University
Judith A. Browne-Dianis, Co-Director, Advancement Project
Kevin Cahalan
Elizabeth Cook
Pamela Dashiell, Lower Ninth Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development
Deacon Margaret Dawson, Diocese of Louisiana, The Episcopal Church
Joel Devalcourt, Action Coalition for Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice - University of New Orleans
Sr. Frances Duos, Congregation of St. Joseph
David Eber, The Lower 9th Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development
Rev. Tyronne Edwards, Zion Travelers Cooperative Center; People's Institute for Survival & Beyond
Melanie Ehrlich, Founder, Citizens' Road Home Action Team (CHAT)
Davida Finger, Loyola University School of Law, Law Clinic
Jordan Flaherty, Louisiana Justice Institute
Bruce France, Mondo Bizarro
Felicia Fuksman
Karen Gadbois, squanderedheritage.com
Tiffany Gardner, National Economic and Social Rights Initiative (NESRI)
R. Justin (Bobby) Garon, Southern Institute for Education and Research
Sharon Hanshaw, Coastal Women for Change
Monique Harden, Advocates for Environmental Human Rights
Chester Hartman, Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Lance Hill, Southern Institute for Education and Research
Mike Howells, C3/Hands Off Iberville
Sister Barbara Hughes, Congregation of St. Joseph
Linda Jackson, Lower 9th Ward Homeowner's Association
Sam L Jackson, Mayday New Orleans,Housing and Human Rights Organization
Endesha Juakali, Survivors Village
Rev. Fred Kammer, SJ, Jesuit Social Research Institute, Loyola University
Michael Kane, Ed.D
Anne Levy
Rabbi Ethan Linden
Rabbi Robert H. Loewy
Dr. Rachel E. Luft
DJ Markey, Pyramid Community Parent Resource Center
Deacon Priscilla Maumus, Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana
Dr Alex Mikulich, Jesuit Social Research Institute, Loyola University
Damekia Morgan, Families and Friends of Louisiana's Incarcerated Children
Jacques Morial, Louisiana Justice Institute
Reilly Morse, Mississippi Center for Justice
Elizabeth Rei Nakamura
Pam Nath, Mennonite Central Committee - New Orleans
Antor Ndep, Common Ground Health Clinic
Gretchen Newby, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine
Jessica Norwood, Emerging ChangeMakers Network
John O'Neal, Junebug Productions
D'Ann Penner, Co-Author, Overcoming Katrina: African American Voices from the Crescent City and Beyond
Deacon Ormonde Plater
Lawrence N. Powell, Ph.D
Katherine Prevost
Bill Quigley, Loyola University School of Law, Law Clinic; Center for Constitutional Rights
Emily Ratner, PATOIS: The New Orleans International Human Rights Film Festival
Ameca A. Reali, Loyola University New Orleans, College of Law
Dr. Kimberley Richards, The People's Institute for Survival and Beyond
Kysha Brown Robinson
Plater Robinson, Southern Institute for Education and Research
Sr. Cynthia Sabathier, Congregation of St. Joseph
Aaron Schneider, Assistant Professor, Political Science, Tulane University
Jordan Shannon
Pastors Victor and Barbara Simon, Caffin Avenue Church of God
Nick Slie, Mondo Bizarro
Johnnie Stevens, Katrina Rita Diaspora Solidarity
Philip Teger, Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Nikki Thanos, Loyola University Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild
Sue and Paul Troyano
Rev. Jim VanderWeele, Community Church Unitarian Universalist
Nathalie Walker, Advocates for Environmental Human Rights
Tracie Washington, Esq., Louisiana Justice Institute
Shep Zitler, New Americans Social Club (New Orleans Holocaust Survivors Organization)

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Sex Offender Registration for Sex Workers Ends in Louisiana

Louisiana's era of forcing certain convicted sex workers to register as sex offenders appears to be over. Governor Jindall's office announced today that he had signed into law a bill, sponsored by Louisiana State Representative Charmaine Marchand Stiaes, that effectively moves prostitution convictions back to the level of misdemeanor.

Previously, police officers and prosecutors in Louisiana had a choice between charging accused sex workers under the prostitution law, which was a misdemeanor, or under Louisiana's 200-plus year-old "Crime Against Nature" law, a felony. That law was interpreted to apply specifically to solicitation for oral or anal sex, but in practice it meant police had ultimate discretion on who to charge with the greater offense.

The majority sentenced under the law were indigent women of color and transgender women of color. Once convicted, they were also forced to register as sex offenders, which brought a long list of restrictions and requirements, including having the words "sex offender" printed in large letters on their driver's license, and the obligation to send a post card to all of their neighbors informing everyone of their conviction.

The new law does not eliminate the "Crime Against Nature" category entirely, but it makes the penalties equal to the misdemeanor-level prostitution charge.

While police continue to harass sex workers across the state, and many women are still imprisoned under these regressive laws (even as US Senator David Vitter faced no penalty for his admitted liaisons with prostitutes), this is a step forward. And much credit should go to the NO Justice Project, convened by Women With A Vision, which worked to raise awareness about this unjust law and fought on multiple fronts to bring it to an end.

In a statement from the NO Justice Project released after the law was signed, Davida Finger, Assistant Clinical Professor at Loyola said, “We welcome this change in the law, which finally brings Louisiana in line with every other state in the country. But the injustice still persists. Almost 40 percent of registered sex offenders in New Orleans are on the registry because of a Solicitation of a Crime Against Nature (SCAN) conviction. They too should receive the benefit of this change in the law and be removed from the sex offender registry.”

Women With A Vision Executive Director Deon Haywood added, "We will continue to fight for justice for all those still living under the penalties of the past. There is still serious work to be done.”

“The grassroots and national leadership of Women with a Vision in tirelessly raising this issue for the past three years is nothing short of heroic,” said Andrea Ritchie, co-counsel in Doe v. Jindal, police misconduct attorney and expert on U.S. policing of women and LGBT people. “This victory is a product of collaboration between community groups, legal advocacy organizations and legislators seeking justice on behalf of the women and LGBT youth suffering from the discriminatory effects of SCAN – it is clear that community organizing can make real change.”

Women With A Vision urges those who have SCAN charges on their record and currently are on the registry to contact them at 504.301.0428.

Photo Above: Women With A Vision Executive Director Deon Haywood.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Legal Challenge to Crime Against Nature Law Moves Forward: Judge Refuses State Request to Dismiss Suit

From our friends at Center for Constitutional Rights
Plaintiffs challenging the discriminatory requirement that they must register as sex offenders because of a Crime Against Nature by Solicitation (CANS) conviction were vindicated yesterday when the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana refused to dismiss their lawsuit against a number of Louisiana state officials. Plaintiffs in Doe v. Jindal who were charged, prosecuted, and convicted of offering oral sex for compensation have been forced to register as sex offenders under a provision of Louisiana’s 205-year-old Crime Against Nature statute, rather than under its prostitution statute, which punishes the same conduct but does not require sex offender registration.

Center for Constitutional Rights Attorney Alexis Agathocleous said, “We are pleased that the court has vindicated our clients and allowed this challenge to go forward. Judge Feldman has agreed that our clients have raised serious constitutional questions about the discriminatory punishment meted out under the old Crime Against Nature by Solicitation statute, and has agreed that they deserve their day in court. Our clients have been labeled as sex offenders simply because they were convicted of Crime Against Nature by Solicitation rather than Prostitution – which encompasses exactly the same conduct. In a significant victory for our clients, the court will now scrutinize their claim that this distinction is unconstitutional because it results only from moral disapproval of sex acts associated with homosexuality.”

Deon Haywood, Executive Director of Women with a Vision, said, “The women and transgender women of our NO Justice Project have been living with the scarlet letter of ‘sex offender’ status for years. Our clients are mothers, daughters, and veterans. Yet, because of this law, they have been forced to live on the fringes of the community, disconnected from many support systems. It’s time for the State of Louisiana to give them justice, and we are deeply gratified that the court will hear their case.”

The Louisiana legislature recently equalized the penalties between CANS and prostitution, and will no longer require sex offender registration for those convicted of CANS in future cases. But those with old convictions must still register.

“The Court has recognized that the individuals who showed tremendous courage in coming forward to challenge mandatory sex offender registration based solely on a Crime Against Nature by Solicitation conviction have made a plausible claim that this requirement has no rational basis, violates their constitutional rights, and is fundamentally unfair," said police misconduct attorney Andrea J. Ritchie, co-counsel on the case. "They are now one step closer to hopefully being in the same position as those convicted since the legislature corrected the disparity between the statutes, and to being free of this outdated, discriminatory and disparate punishment for a minor nonviolent offense.”

For more information about the federal lawsuit challenging this law, visit this link.

Police misconduct attorney Andrea J. Ritchie, Esq., the Loyola University New Orleans College of Law, Law Clinic, and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP are co-counsel in the case.

The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.

The mission of
Women with a Vision is to improve the lives of marginalized women, their families, and communities by addressing the social conditions that hinder their health and well-being. We accomplish this through relentless advocacy, health education, supportive services, and community-based participatory research.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Exposing Unconstitutional Police Practices From New York to New Orleans

By Alison McCrary
As violent crime continues to surge and dozens of New Orleans police offers are under indictment, investigation, or have already pled guilty to serious crimes, the New Orleans Police Department has expanded policies that effectively undermine the already-challenged public confidence in the NOPD.

The Louisiana Justice Institute (LJI) and the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana (ACLU) have received numerous complaints from law abiding citizens who have been stopped and interrogated by NOPD officers in apparent violation of the U.S. Constitution. A similar policy of the New York Police Department was challenged in court as unconstitional and racially discriminatory. As a result, the NYPD made substantive changes to the policy and its implementation.

What will it take for the New Orleans Police Department to learn from the costly lessons taught to New York Police Department by civil rights litigation?

Police officers may stop individuals but only in compliance with a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Terry v. Ohio, which held an officer may stop an individual and conduct a field interview or carefully limited search only if the officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred or is about to occur. Such constitutional stops are referred to as “Terry stops.”

While limited Terry stops are needed to investigate “reasonably suspicious” criminal activity on our streets, under the leadership of the newly appointed Superintendent Ronal Serpas, numerous law abiding citizens have reported an increase in unconstitutional stops not warranted by the reasonable suspicion requirement. Such “Serpas stops” violate the law and the constitutional protections guaranteed to citizens.

NYPD is facing a federal civil rights class action lawsuit challenging the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk practices, which among other policing issues was the topic of a New York Times article earlier this year.

Through Floyd v. City of New York, which stems from Center for Constitutional Right's landmark racial profiling case, Daniels v. City of New York that led to the disbanding of the notorious NYPD Street Crime Unit, the organization collected over ten years worth of the NYPD’s own data on officer stop-and-frisk activity.

The data collected by the Center for Constitutional rights revealed that in New York City:

· Over 80 percent of NYPD initiated stops are of Blacks and Latinos while Whites comprised only 20 percent;
· Nearly 90 percent of all stops uncovered no weapons, contraband or evidence of criminal activity;
· Blacks and Latinos are more likely to be frisked after a NYPD-initiated stop than Whites, and,
· Blacks and Latinos are more likely to have physical force used against them during a NYPD-initiated stop than Whites.

In New Orleans, the ACLU of Louisiana last week raised the question of whether all the stops being conducted by NOPD officers were proper. The ACLU received numerous reports from New Orleanians who said they were stopped for no apparent reason and were required to provide identification. New Orleans police officers are collecting personal information on residents.

However, NOPD could not answers questions raised relating to exactly how many stops the New Orleans police officers are making and whether there has been an increase since NOPD leaders have begun scrutinizing the stops at the Comstat meetings. NOPD said that long-term data is not readily available because officers have been slowly shifting to entering the information into a centralized database instead of the district ones. However, such information is legally required to remain on file at NOPD according to case precendent.

What will it take for NOPD to recognize and respect the rights of citizens who are protected by the Constitution of the United States? Respect for the legal rights of the citizens they serve is essential to the NOPD restoring public trust and being successful in making New Orleans a safer place for everyone to live and work.

If you believe you have been improperly stopped, please share your story with the Louisiana Justice Institute by calling 504-872-9134 and/or file a complaint through the ACLU’s website.

Alison McCrary is an attorney and Soros Justice Advocacy Fellow at the Louisiana Justice Institute. She received her Juris Doctor of Law from Loyola University College of Law where she served as a member of Moot Court and president of the Public Interest Law Group. Alison is a member of the National Lawyers Guild.

Friday, March 30, 2012

The End of Sex Offender Registration for Louisiana Sex Workers?

Judge Rules That Sex-Offender Registration for “Crime Against Nature by Solicitation” Convictions Is Unconstitutional
From Center for Constitutional Rights:

Yesterday, one day after attorneys from the Center for Constitutional Rights argued that individuals convicted prior to August 2011 under Louisiana’s “Crime Against Nature by Solicitation” (CANS) law should not have to register as sex offenders, a federal judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana agreed and granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. The statute was amended in August 2011 to no longer require those convicted of CANS to register, but the change was not made retroactive.

“The defendants fail to credibly serve up even one unique legitimating governmental interest that can rationally explain the registration requirement imposed on those convicted of Crime
Against Nature by Solicitation,” wrote Judge Martin L. C. Feldman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. “The Court is left with no other conclusion but that the relationship between the classification is so shallow as to render the distinction wholly arbitrary.”

“Today’s decision is a powerful vindication of our clients’ right to equal protection before the law. The court has agreed that they have been singled out for this harsh treatment without a legitimate or rational purpose, and that this cannot stand,” said Alexis Agathocleous, staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Previously, people accused of soliciting sex for a fee in Louisiana could be criminally charged in two ways: either under the prostitution statute or under the solicitation provision of the Crime Against Nature statute. A CANS conviction carried harsher penalties than a prostitution conviction, including the sex-offender registration requirement. Police and prosecutors had unfettered discretion in choosing which to charge. Judge Feldman’s ruling holds that the discrepancy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.

“Today’s ruling is a testament to the power and importance of speaking out for justice. Individuals marginalized by the CANS law told their stories, spearheading a campaign to change the law,” said Deon Haywood, executive director of Women With A Vision, a community-based organization in New Orleans that has led advocacy efforts around this issue. “The people heard, the legislature heard, and now the courts have heard. Now we can move on to healing and renewal.”

Many of the plaintiffs in the case had been unable to secure work or housing as a result of their registration as sex offenders. Several had been barred from homeless shelters, one had been physically threatened by a neighbor, and another had been refused residential substance abuse treatment because providers will not accept registered sex offenders at their facilities.

“This is an important victory in light of the Department of Justice’s recent finding that this charge was being discriminatorily applied against poor Black women and transgender women and gay men,” said Andrea J. Ritchie, a police misconduct attorney who is co-counsel on the case. “It takes away a discriminatory tool used by police and prosecutors.”

Plaintiffs are represented by CCR, police misconduct attorney Andrea J. Ritchie, Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Stuart H. Smith Law Clinic & Center for Social Justice, and pro bono counsel Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP.

For a letter from Deon Haywood with her reaction, see this link.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Another Victory Against Louisiana's Crime Against Nature Statute: Judge Orders Plaintiffs Removed from Sex Offender Registry

A judge's order yesterday took another step towards ending the harsh legacy of Louisiana's Crime Against Nature Law. Below is a press release on the issue from Center for Constitutional Rights.
Louisiana must “cease and desist” from placing any individuals convicted of Crime Against Nature by Solicitation on Sex Offender Registry

Yesterday, a federal judge declared that requiring individuals convicted under Louisiana’s “Crime Against Nature by Solicitation” (CANS) law to register as sex offenders is unconstitutional. He ordered defendants to cease and desist from placing any individuals convicted of CANS on the registry and to remove the plaintiffs from the registry within 30 days. Defendants have agreed not to appeal the judge’s order.

In a March 30th ruling, Judge Martin L. C. Feldman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana issued an opinion concluding that the sex offender registration requirement under CANS violated the Equal Protection Clause. The State, wrote Judge Feldman, could not “credibly serve up even one unique legitimating governmental interest [to] rationally explain” why those convicted under the CANS statute were singled out for sex offender registration, while individuals convicted of identical conduct under Louisiana’s prostitution statute were not required to register.

“We are pleased that the court has granted full relief to our clients and found the registration requirement unconstitutional across the board, creating a path to justice for everyone who is still required to register based on a Crime Against Nature by Solicitation conviction,” said Alexis Agathocleous, staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights who represents the plaintiffs. “We hope that the state will move with all deliberate speed to apply this ruling to individuals who are still affected by this unconstitutional and discriminatory requirement.”

Previously, people accused of soliciting sex for a fee in Louisiana could be criminally charged in two ways: either under the prostitution statute or under the solicitation provision of the Crime Against Nature statute. A CANS conviction carried harsher penalties than a prostitution conviction, including the sex offender registration requirement. Police and prosecutors had unfettered discretion in choosing which to charge.

“Judge Feldman’s order is a huge step towards righting an egregious wrong,” said Deon Haywood, executive director of Women With A Vision, a community-based organization in New Orleans that has led advocacy efforts around this issue. “For far too long, CANS has unfairly attached a stigma to individuals whom police and prosecutors decided should be punished more harshly than others. Judge Feldman’s order brings this practice to an end.”

Many of the plaintiffs in the case had been unable to secure work or housing as a result of their registration as sex offenders. Several had been barred from homeless shelters, one had been physically threatened by a neighbor, and another had been refused residential substance abuse treatment because providers will not accept registered sex offenders at their facilities.

“Yesterday’s judgment represents a significant victory for women and LGBTQ people of color who have long labored under the discriminatory policing and prosecution of CANS,” said Andrea J. Ritchie, a police misconduct attorney who is co-counsel on the case. “We sincerely hope that the state will proceed swiftly and efficiently to stop the continuing violations of the rights of people convicted of CANS still on the registry and immediately remove them.”

Individuals who are on the registry solely as a result of CANS convictions prior to August 15, 2011 should send their contact info to info@ccrjustice.org.

Plaintiffs are represented by CCR, police misconduct attorney Andrea J. Ritchie, Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Stuart H. Smith Law Clinic & Center for Social Justice, and pro bono counsel Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. Visit www.ccrjustice.org and follow @theCCR.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Victory! Sex Workers Removed From Louisiana Sex Offender Registry

From our friends at Women With A Vision and Center for Constitutional Rights:

Louisiana to Remove Hundreds of Individuals Unconstitutionally Placed on Sex Offender Registry

Last night, in a federal class action lawsuit filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and co-counsel, a settlement with Louisiana was finalized that will remove from the sex offender registry approximately 700 individuals who had been required to register solely because of a Crime Against Nature by Solicitation (CANS) conviction.  Today’s settlement follows a ruling last year in a related case that found the CANS registration requirement unconstitutional. Despite that ruling, hundreds of people convicted of CANS remained on the registry.  CCR filed a class action on their behalf, which led to today’s settlement.

“We are gratified that the state has agreed to vindicate the rights of hundreds of people who continued to be unconstitutionally registered as sex offenders,” said Center for Constitutional Rights Staff Attorney Alexis Agathocleous.  “This registration requirement has disproportionately affected African American women and LGBT individuals who will now – finally – be able to begin to rebuild their lives.”

When charging someone for soliciting oral or anal sex for a fee, police and prosecutors in Louisiana have unfettered discretion in choosing whether to charge someone with prostitution or CANS.  Until 2011, however, only a CANS conviction required sex offender registration. The court previously held application of the sex offender registration requirement to nine individuals unconstitutional because it imposed different consequences for a CANS conviction than a prostitution conviction for exactly the same conduct, without any rational basis. 

“I am overjoyed.  This is truly an historic moment. Justice has prevailed and dignity has been restored to the women and men who have been denied their basic human rights for so long. We celebrate this true collaboration of community, affected individuals, and the amazing lawyers that together made a difference,” said Deon Haywood, Executive Director of Women With A Vision, a community-based organization in New Orleans that has led advocacy efforts around this issue. 

People affected by this law have been barred from homeless shelters, physically threatened, and refused residential substance abuse treatment because providers will not accept registered sex offenders at their facilities.  As in the earlier case, all plaintiffs in this action proceeded anonymously for fear of retaliation.

“The lingering injustice, resulting from over 20 years of discriminatory enforcement of this law at police and prosecutors’ whims, will now finally come to an end,” said Andrea Ritchie, co-counsel to CCR in Doe v. Jindal and Doe v. Caldwell.  “The State of Louisiana will now finally bring its conduct into compliance with the Constitution and the court’s prior rulings. This is an unqualified victory for Black women, poor women, and LGBTQ people who fought back against injustice and won.”

Plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Constitutional Rights, the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg, LLP, police misconduct attorney Andrea J. Ritchie, and Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Stuart H. Smith Law Clinic & Center for Social Justice. 

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Advocates Letter to St. Bernard Parish, in response to Housing Discrimination

(To add your name to the list of signers, please email StBernardParishLetter@gmail.com)

September 14, 2009

via facsimile: 278.4209
St. Bernard Parish Council & President
8201 W. Judge Perez Drive
Chalmette, Louisiana 70043

Re: Fair Housing in St. Bernard Parish

Dear St. Bernard Officials:

We are a coalition of community organizations from the Greater New Orleans area, writing to express our grave concern and disappointment over recent actions taken by St. Bernard Parish government to block equitable housing access in the Greater New Orleans area.

The Parish was sued by Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center (GNOFHAC) in 2006 for alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, in enacting several housing ordinances with the intent and effect of discriminating against minorities. At that time, GNOFHAC fought to enjoin the Parish from enacting a so-called “blood relative ordinance, that is, the housing ordinance passed on September 19, 2006 that stated “No person…shall rent, lease, loan, or otherwise allow occupancy or use of any single-family residence located in an R-1 zone by any person or group of persons, other than a family member(s) related by blood within the first, second, or third direct ascending or descending generation(s) without first obtaining a Permissive Use Permit from the S. Bernard Parish Council.”

On February 27, 2008, you agreed the Parish would no longer (a) refuse to rent a dwelling unit, or otherwise make unavailable or deny a dwelling unit, to any person because of race or national origin; (b) deny minority citizens the same rights as are enjoyed by white citizens to make and enforce contracts; (c) deny minority citizens the same rights as are enjoyed by white citizens to lease, hold and otherwise enjoy real property; (d) deny any person equal protection of the law by discriminating on the basis of race and national origin in the leasing of real property; or (e) retaliate against Plaintiffs or any other person who alleges that Defendants have violated the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.

In spite of this agreement, in September 2008 the Parish violated its terms by enacting an ordinance that placed a moratorium on the construction of all multi-family housing (i.e., buildings with more than 5 units) for a period of twelve months or until the Parish Council enacted certain zoning updates. The effect of this ordinance was that it triggered cumbersome bureaucratic procedures, including a special election for which that developer must bear the costs. This ordinance would have had a detrimental impact on housing development, and stymie movement of certain people who want to reside in St. Bernard Parish. People of color, who are more likely to depend on multi-family housing post-Katrina, would have been especially harmed if this moratorium had been allowed to stand.

This latest initiative follows a pattern and practice in St. Bernard Parish to prevent development of low income housing at a time when our community could not be more desperate for safe and affordable units.

St. Bernard Parish’s post-Katrina efforts to rebuild a racially segregated Parish by passing and implementing rules to prevent non-White homeowners from moving to and living in the Parish have become an international symbol of injustice in the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast. The 2006 “blood-relative” ordinance would have prohibited single family homeowners from renting to anyone other than blood relatives, effectively excluding many ethnic groups from residing in St. Bernard Parish; including African Americans, Jewish Americans, Vietnamese Americans, Latinos, and other populations who did not live in the parish in large numbers pre-Katrina.

Fortunately, U.S. District Court Judge Helen G. Berrigan ruled this 2006 ‘blood-relative’ ordinance is illegal based on its discriminatory intent and impact. The Times Picayune editorial board wrote, “This ruling strips off the camouflage and reveals St. Bernard's actions for what they really are: an effort to keep lower-income people and African-Americans from moving into the mostly white parish.”

Since the date of the district court’s first order, Judge Berrigan has held the Parish in contempt three times for its failures to comply with the agreed upon and court-approved Consent Decree. But the St. Bernard Parish government, with apparent support from Parish residents and associations, continues to pass laws in support of segregated housing. Related ordinances restricting the development of rental housing in St. Bernard Parish have also been struck down as discriminatory, yet the Parish forges on in this regressive homage to racial and ethnic isolation.

These illegal ordinances and their progeny hurt all Greater New Orleans area residents by erecting barricades that obstruct a just rebuilding, instead of clearing the road for an equitable right to return home.

We will not be silent as our neighbor community actively discriminates. These policies create a climate of discrimination and magnify racial and ethnic tensions in our community, while also exacerbating our local housing crisis. As concerned community members, we call on St. Bernard Parish government to immediately end these discriminatory practices, and instead to join with us in standing for a just rebuilding for all Gulf Coast residents. By standing together, all of our communities benefit.

Signed,

Organizations Endorsing:
Action Coalition for Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice - University of New Orleans
Advancement Project
Advocates for Environmental Human Rights
C3/Hands Off Iberville
Caffin Avenue Church of God
Coastal Women for Change
Common Ground Health Clinic
Community Church Unitarian Universalist - New Orleans
Emerging ChangeMakers Network
Families and Friends of Louisiana's Incarcerated Children
Homeless Action Team of Tulane University (HATT)
Jesuit Social Research Institute, Loyola University
Junebug Productions
Katrina Rita Diaspora Solidarity
Loyola University Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild
Louisiana Justice Institute
Lower Ninth Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development
Lower 9th Ward Homeowner's Association
Mayday New Orleans,Housing and Human Rights Organization
Mennonite Central Committee - New Orleans
Mississippi Center for Justice
Mondo Bizarro
Moving Forward Gulf Coast, Inc
National Economic and Social Rights Initiative (NESRI)
New Orleans Palestine Solidarity
New Americans Social Club (New Orleans Holocaust Survivors Organization)
PATOIS: The New Orleans International Human Rights Film Festival
People's Institute for Survival & Beyond
Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Pyramid Community Parent Resource Center
Southern Institute for Education and Research
Survivors Village
US Human Rights Network
Zion Travelers Cooperative Center

Individual Endorsements:
Kali Akuno, US Human Rights Network
Jay Arena, C3/Hands Off Iberville
Sister Theresa Anne Billeaud
Nell Bolton, Episcopal Community Services, Diocese of Louisiana
Trupania W. Bonner, Moving Forward Gulf Coast, Inc
Douglas Brinkley, Professor of History, Rice University
Judith A. Browne-Dianis, Co-Director, Advancement Project
Kevin Cahalan
Elizabeth Cook
Pamela Dashiell, Lower Ninth Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development
Deacon Margaret Dawson, Diocese of Louisiana, The Episcopal Church
Joel Devalcourt, Action Coalition for Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice - University of New Orleans
Sr. Frances Duos, Congregation of St. Joseph
David Eber, The Lower 9th Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development
Rev. Tyronne Edwards, Zion Travelers Cooperative Center; People's Institute for Survival & Beyond
Melanie Ehrlich, Founder, Citizens' Road Home Action Team (CHAT)
Davida Finger, Loyola University School of Law, Law Clinic
Jordan Flaherty, Louisiana Justice Institute
Bruce France, Mondo Bizarro
Felicia Fuksman
Karen Gadbois, squanderedheritage.com
Tiffany Gardner, National Economic and Social Rights Initiative (NESRI)
R. Justin (Bobby) Garon, Southern Institute for Education and Research
Sharon Hanshaw, Coastal Women for Change
Monique Harden, Advocates for Environmental Human Rights
Chester Hartman, Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Lance Hill, Southern Institute for Education and Research
Mike Howells, C3/Hands Off Iberville
Sister Barbara Hughes, Congregation of St. Joseph
Linda Jackson, Lower 9th Ward Homeowner's Association
Sam L Jackson, Mayday New Orleans,Housing and Human Rights Organization
Endesha Juakali, Survivors Village
Rev. Fred Kammer, SJ, Jesuit Social Research Institute, Loyola University
Michael Kane, Ed.D
Anne Levy
Rabbi Ethan Linden
Rabbi Robert H. Loewy
Dr. Rachel E. Luft
DJ Markey, Pyramid Community Parent Resource Center
Deacon Priscilla Maumus, Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana
Dr Alex Mikulich, Jesuit Social Research Institute, Loyola University
Damekia Morgan, Families and Friends of Louisiana's Incarcerated Children
Jacques Morial, Louisiana Justice Institute
Reilly Morse, Mississippi Center for Justice
Elizabeth Rei Nakamura
Pam Nath, Mennonite Central Committee - New Orleans
Antor Ndep, Common Ground Health Clinic
Gretchen Newby, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine
Jessica Norwood, Emerging ChangeMakers Network
John O'Neal, Junebug Productions
D'Ann Penner, Co-Author, Overcoming Katrina: African American Voices from the Crescent City and Beyond
Deacon Ormonde Plater
Lawrence N. Powell, Ph.D
Katherine Prevost
Bill Quigley, Loyola University School of Law, Law Clinic; Center for Constitutional Rights
Emily Ratner, PATOIS: The New Orleans International Human Rights Film Festival
Ameca A. Reali, Loyola University New Orleans, College of Law
Dr. Kimberley Richards, The People's Institute for Survival and Beyond
Kysha Brown Robinson
Plater Robinson, Southern Institute for Education and Research
Sr. Cynthia Sabathier, Congregation of St. Joseph
Aaron Schneider, Assistant Professor, Political Science, Tulane University
Jordan Shannon
Pastors Victor and Barbara Simon, Caffin Avenue Church of God
Nick Slie, Mondo Bizarro
Johnnie Stevens, Katrina Rita Diaspora Solidarity
Philip Teger, Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Nikki Thanos, Loyola University Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild
Sue and Paul Troyano
Rev. Jim VanderWeele, Community Church Unitarian Universalist
Nathalie Walker, Advocates for Environmental Human Rights
Tracie Washington, Esq., Louisiana Justice Institute
Shep Zitler, New Americans Social Club (New Orleans Holocaust Survivors Organization)

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Statement From LGBTQ March and Rally For Safety In Solidarity

For more information on the reasons for this statement, see this link.

As members of the LGBTQ community in New Orleans, we support the safety and well-being of our community and of all New Orleanians. We believe that increased police presence and the continuing expansion of the prison-industrial complex is not the way to make our community safer.

The LGBT March and Rally Against Violence to be held Wednesday, April 2 calls for strategies that put our community members at more risk, not less. From Compton's Cafeteria riots and the  Stonewall Rebellion in the 1960s to the work of contemporary groups such as INCITE!: Women, Gender Non-Conforming, and Trans People of Color* Against Violence, Critical Resistance, Women with a Vision, BreakOUT!, and Black & Pink, LGBTQ people have taken stands against police violence and harassment. Increasing police involvement in our community threatens the safety of many of us.  

We ask that the goals of your march be changed to call for real safety for all of us through solidarity, rather than false solutions of policing and jails. We are also calling for dialogue with the march organizers and the wider LGBTQ community.

Policing, surveillance, and imprisonment target specific groups of people: people of color, transgender, genderqueer and gender-nonconforming people, street youth, and sex workers. The state of Louisiana still has a "Crime Against Nature" law on the books, and this law is used against the LGBTQ community, including in Baton Rouge where police were found to be using this law to target gay men. In New Orleans, 82 people have been charged with "Solicitation of a Crime Against Nature" in the last two years, resulting in a felony conviction with required sex offender registration. This law, which unjustly criminalized in large numbers low-income Black women and transgender women of color, was challenged by Women With a Vision and the Center for Constitutional Rights, who won a victory in 2012 that removed approximately 700 individuals from the sex-offender registry.

A 2010 study published in the journal Pediatrics found that in our schools, LGBTQ youth are more likely to be suspended, arrested and imprisoned. The report published by the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana, Locked Up & Out: LGBTQ Youth and Louisiana’s Juvenile Justice System, shares the stories of what happened to many of these young people in Louisiana.

A 2012 study by the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs found that transgender individuals experience three times as much police violence as non-transgender individuals, and those numbers are even higher for transgender people of color. In New Orleans, organizations such as BreakOUT! and Women With A Vision have documented patterns of discrimination from the NOPD against the LGBTQ community, including rampant police profiling and threats of using condoms as evidence of prostitution, especially against transgender women of color.

Here in New Orleans, the US Department of Justice found that the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) has discriminatory practices against the LGBTQ community and specifically addressed these issues in the Federal Consent Decree. This followed organizing by LGBTQ youth of BreakOUT! in their campaign, “We Deserve Better.” The campaign also resulted in the adoption of Policy 402 on the 44th Anniversary of the Stonewall riots, which prohibits the profiling of people on the basis of gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation. These victories only came after years of grassroots organizing by LGBTQ youth, and yet with continued police harassment, much more remains to be done. 

Our home is the incarceration capital of the world. One in 86 adult Louisiana residents is in prison. Approximately 5,000 African-American men from New Orleans are in state prisons, compared to 400 white men. Our city jail, Orleans Parish Prison, is a site of rape and violence that a Human Rights Watch report called "a nightmare" for LGBTQ individuals. Incarceration has not made us safer as a community— and in fact does not deter crime. When our community members are locked away, it tears at the social fabric that holds our community together. Children grow up without parents at home, lovers long for their partners, and groups miss their members.  

Policing and incarceration is also a tool of gentrification and displacement, adding to a hostile environment for working class African-American residents still recovering from Hurricane Katrina. We can look to the examples of the controversies in Chicago's Boys Town neighborhood and New York City's West Village. In Boys Town, perceived increase in violence led to white gay men calling for more police patrols, and in doing so the LGBTQ youth of color who hung out near the community center in the neighborhood were unfairly targeted by the increased police. That effort did not support the unity of the LGBTQ community. A similar situation evolved in the West Village in New York City, where residents, many of whom were white, affluent gay men, responding to incidents of violence, pushed for Quality of Life policies. FIERCE, an LGBTQ youth of color organization, has campaigned against these policies, stating: "To this day, LGBTQ youth who go to the pier have reported sharp increases in police harassment, false arrest and racial and gender profiling - usually for just being in the neighborhood...This emphasis on policing drew massive resources from other social services and education that have the potential to actually address poverty and safety. In fact, under Giuliani and continuing through the years of the Bloomberg administration, the only 'public service' that increased funding was 'criminal justice.'"

Here in New Orleans, we've already begun to see the impact of massive gentrification projects on low-income LGBTQ communities of color. The targeting of transgender women on Tulane Avenue by the NOPD continues to put some of our city's most vulnerable populations at even greater risk for violence and danger. For many LGBTQ communities of color, increased policing and increased use of surveillance equipment means increased risk of harm.

Supporting each other in the face of violence does not have to take the form of reporting to police. Community safety comes from solidarity and liberation. It comes from ensuring that all people have access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, employment, and education. We hope that through dialogue we can address concerns of all members of our community and arrive at empowering solutions together.

Signed:
Queerspiracy
Occupy NOLA

Monday, July 18, 2011

Stereotypes, Myths, & Criminalizing Policies: Regulating the Lives of Poor Women

An important statement from the New Orleans organization the Women's Health and Justice Initiative:
Since the beginning of the year, we have witnessed a surge of legislative attacks targeting poor communities through bills calling for mandatory drug testing as an eligibility requirement to receive federal aid under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in over two-dozen states. (TANF is a federally funded, state- administered aid program created when President Bill Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996C (PRWORA), which abolished Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). It is more widely known as the Welfare Reform Act.)

§ On January 25, 2011 U.S. Senator David Vitter, R-Louisiana, introduced The Drug Free Families Act of 2011, (S. 83), which would require all 50 states to drug test all TANF applicants and recipients.

§ On May 10, 2011, Missouri state legislature passed Senate Bill 607, which require welfare applicants and recipients to pass a drug test in order to receive public assistance, if ‘reasonable suspicion’ is raised by a social worker; and on July 12, 2011, Democratic Governor Jay Nixon signed the bill into law.

§ On May 31, 2011, Governor Rick Scott, R- Florida, signed legislation into law requiring adults applying for welfare assistance to undergo drug screenings.

§ And for the fourth consecutive year, Louisiana State Representative John LaBruzzo aggressively tried to get similar legislation passed before House Bill 7 died in the Senate on June 21, 2011 after winning approval in the House.

The targeting of welfare recipients – under the false pretense of “saving tax dollars from supporting someone’ s drug addiction” or by “helping drug addicts become productive citizens” – is nothing more than the continual use of stereotypes and myths to criminalize the lives of poor women and their families through invasive and unconstitutional regulatory policies of economic violence.

The Women’s Health & Justice Initiative (WHJI) condemns these coordinated federal and state assaults on recipients of public cash assistance. The legislative actions of Governor Scott, Senator Vitter, State Representative LaBruzzo, and others criminalize the poverty of welfare recipients, exploit low-income women’s economic vulnerability, and stereotype welfare recipients as illegal drug users by publicly presuming welfare recipients’ socio-economic status as linked to addiction.

Punitive, Criminalizing, & Discriminatory Attacks

Using the ‘Get Tough’ rhetoric of the War on Drugs; reproductive regulation; and neoliberal austerity measures to attack poor and marginalized women (who rely on government subsidies for financial support) irresponsibly exploits their economic vulnerability by falsely implying their assistance is the cause of the country’s financial woes. Although recipients of public assistance are no more likely to use illegal drugs than the general population, they are often disproportionately targeted by elected officials as social burdens in need of governmental regulation.

At both the federal and state levels, Senator Vitter and State Representative LaBruzzo have tried unsuccessfully for years to restrict public assistance eligibility through mandatory drug testing under the disguise of helping recipients with untreated drug addictions. Despite the fact such testing has been ruled unconstitutional by the Sixth Circuit in 2000, Vitter and LaBruzzo continue to promote dangerously punitive policies.

If passed, Senator Vitter’s Drug Free Families Act of 2011 would amend part A of The TANF Program and thereby require all states to drug test all TANF applicants and recipients. The bill will deny assistance to individuals who test positive for illegal drugs and those convicted of drug-related crimes. Not only will this Act further restrict the privacy and agency of women who are daily portrayed as deceitful, deviant, oversexed, and addicts—all because of racialized gender-based misconceptions of what it means to receive public assistance- it will also subject them to various forms of discrimination with regards to housing, employment, education, and their voting rights.

Additionally, Louisiana State Representative LaBruzzo’s House Bill 7 would have required twenty percent of TANF recipients to submit to drug tests as a condition to receive public assistance – a similar measure attempted by former State Representative and Klu Klux Klan member David Duke in 1989.

Under this year’s version of Representative LaBruzzo’s bill, a participant who wouldn’t sign a written form granting ‘consent’ to a drug test would not have been eligible to receive or to continue to receive cash assistance. Consenting to a drug test is an infringement of one’s constitutional right to privacy and equal protection, yet refusal is a denial of public benefits and a presumption of drug addiction. Clearly, this legislation was designed to both publicly demonize and undermine the agency of welfare recipients – because placing women in a position to “choose” between their right to privacy and the care of their family is not an exercise of “consent” but a blatant form of coercion. The use of coercive policies to compel welfare recipients to submit to drug testing ignores the complex structures of poverty and poor women’s daily battles for subsistence, as they often bear the brunt of income and housing related poverty, violence, and discrimination. By placing women in such positions, LaBruzzo and others are able to justify these systemic forms of coercion by dehumanizing the lives of poor women and their families.

Lastly, legislation signed into law by Governor Scott of Florida on May 31,2011 and by Governor Nixon of Missouri on July 12, 2011 both require adults applying for temporary cash assistance to undergo drug screenings. The Florida law took effect July 1st, which requires the Florida Department of Children and Family Services to drug test all adults applying for TANF assistance. Applicants are responsible for the cost of the screening and will be reimbursed by the state only if they pass the drug test. Those who fail can enter a drug rehabilitation program and reapply six months later or designate someone on their behalf to receive their child's benefits. Governor Scott claims, “we don't want to waste tax dollars...and we want to give people an incentive to not use drugs.” His statement equates public assistance with ‘waste’ and exploits the vulnerability of women’s economic status by violating their Fourth Amendment rights under the pretext of deficit reduction.

In Missouri, the recently signed law allows officials with the Department of Social Services to drug test recipients of public assistance if there is ‘reasonable cause’ to suspect illegal drug use. If an applicant tests positive, they must complete a substance abuse program. And if an applicant refuses to take a drug test or attend a substance abuse program, they won’t be eligible for assistance for three years. This law, like the others, stigmatizes welfare recipient’s economic status and equates their subsidy status with addiction.

The Truth Behind the Legislation

Not only is drug testing unconstitutional, it’s ineffective and costly. Drug testing does nothing but further marginalize and stigmatize TANF recipients. It implies that recipients are to blame for the nation’s current economic deficit, as opposed to the wasteful spending of public resources on the corporate welfare giants of Wall Street and the War on Drugs; militarism; and the over production of unnecessary commodities that negatively impact our environment. The aggressive use of punitive neoliberal policies like these rely on fear and racist stereotypes to falsely frame low-income families as economic burdens of the state, while ignoring the disastrous economic burdens of corporate welfare.

Stereotypes and stigmatizing labels associated with welfare are dramatically different in reality than what is often decried by elected officials. The racial and gendered subtext of prevailing welfare stereotypes of ‘laziness,’ ‘uncontrolled sexuality,’ and ‘drug addiction,’ implicitly informs the negative treatment of people on food stamps; landlords refusing to accept subsidized housing vouchers as rent; the general perception that welfare recipients only have children to receive a “welfare check;” the regulation of low-income women of color’s fertility; and the scapegoating of recipients as constantly burdening the government to take care of them. Despite the fact that the current TANF program carries a 5-year term limit, along with a variety of other requirements and restrictions, the false perception of low-income women of color having endless benefits to support drug habits persists.

Nationally, financial assistance to poor families represents approximately 0.7% of the federal budget. Here in Louisiana, the number of people receiving cash assistance through TANF has been declining since President Bill Clinton signed the 1996 welfare reform legislation; and since Hurricane Katrina, the numbers of families receiving assistance has decreased by 74 %.

Despite the claims of lawmakers like Rep. John LaBruzzo, cash assistance payments in Louisiana represents less than 1% of the state budget, with:

§ Less than .3% of the population receiving assistance through the Family Independence Temporary Assistance Program or FITAP (13,237 people out a population of 4.5 million)

§ The average public assistance grant being only $189 a month for a family of three, and

§ 74% of receipts in the state being children (only 3,656 of the 13,237 recipients are adults)

The reality of welfare in Louisiana clearly illustrates drug testing has nothing to do with saving tax payers dollars and balancing state budgets, but much to do with who’s perceived as receiving benefits.

What We Need

These current actions represent yet another attempt by conservative legislators to pass criminalizing policies to restrict and police the sexuality and reproductive autonomy of subsidy-reliant women under the pretext of saving taxpayers’ dollars. The same women whose fertility and motherhood become routine targets of public debates, reproductive legislation, and policy mandates are the same women who are falsely accused of being economic burdens on the state and punished through government funded programs for being poor, thus becoming disproportionately subjected to racialized gender related poverty, violence, discrimination, and displacement.

We need legislators to take real leadership in addressing budget shortfalls not by weakening the capacity of women to care for their families, which will ultimately create more social and economic cost in the future, but by targeting inflated costs of corporations that pose dangerous risks to our communities. The efforts that have been employed to police the lives of poor women could be better used to:

§ Regulate dangerous industries and out-of-control military spending that threaten the social, economic, and environmental health of families and communities;

§ Increase the efficacy and availability of social programs designed to improve the living conditions of poor communities;

§ Support responsible, accessible, and affordable public services and resources that respect the reproductive and economic autonomy of women of color and low-income women;

§ Prioritize poor women’s economic and social needs to take care of their families in safe and healthy environments.

Legislation that is appropriately funded and provide for childcare resources, family treatment programs, mental health services, non-discriminatory employment opportunities, affordable and decent housing, and safe and non-coercive health care services is needed to assist low-income families not punitive, ineffective, and expensive drug testing initiatives that restrict the opportunities and life chances of low-income women and their families.

Formed in 2006 to address the hidden and persistent racialized gender-based forms of violence, neglect, and inequality laid bare and exacerbated by the disasters of 2005, the Women’s Health & Justice Initiative (WHJI) is a feminist of color organization based in New Orleans that engages in public education campaigns, research projects, and grassroots organizing activities to improve the social and economic health of women of color and our communities. WHJI advocates against punitive social policies, practices, and behaviors that restrict, exploit, regulate, and criminalize the bodies and lives of low-income and working class women of color most vulnerable to violence, poverty, and population control policies of blame, displacement, and social neglect. Our organizing challenges the social invisibility of the various forms of social exclusion, violence, marginality, and socio-economic vulnerability women color and poor women experience, contend with, and fight against —by staving off attempts to further undermine our human rights—while forging new opportunities to build the capacity of our communities to address the social justice implications of women’s economic and social needs to live in healthy and safe environments.

Photo Above: Staff of the New Orleans Women's Health Clinic, 2007.